<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has Google shrunk it&#8217;s index or cleaned it out?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://selfmademinds.com/200712/has-google-shrunk-its-index-or-cleaned-it-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://selfmademinds.com/200712/has-google-shrunk-its-index-or-cleaned-it-out/</link>
	<description>Sharing lessons learned in business and online marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 03:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jack Yan</title>
		<link>http://selfmademinds.com/200712/has-google-shrunk-its-index-or-cleaned-it-out/#comment-6612</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Yan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 05:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selfmademinds.com/200712/has-google-shrunk-its-index-or-cleaned-it-out/#comment-6612</guid>
		<description>I have been noticing the same for months and the reductions seem to have continued into January 2008. I’ve seen halving for the terms we track but nothing quite as drastic as the figures being reported above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been noticing the same for months and the reductions seem to have continued into January 2008. I’ve seen halving for the terms we track but nothing quite as drastic as the figures being reported above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottUA</title>
		<link>http://selfmademinds.com/200712/has-google-shrunk-its-index-or-cleaned-it-out/#comment-5711</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottUA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selfmademinds.com/200712/has-google-shrunk-its-index-or-cleaned-it-out/#comment-5711</guid>
		<description>It seems like Google is always tweaking it's listings.  One day you'll see 2,220,000 for a term.  And you'll look the next day and they'll list half of that. I've given up long ago trying to figure them out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like Google is always tweaking it&#8217;s listings.  One day you&#8217;ll see 2,220,000 for a term.  And you&#8217;ll look the next day and they&#8217;ll list half of that. I&#8217;ve given up long ago trying to figure them out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnathan</title>
		<link>http://selfmademinds.com/200712/has-google-shrunk-its-index-or-cleaned-it-out/#comment-5610</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 17:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selfmademinds.com/200712/has-google-shrunk-its-index-or-cleaned-it-out/#comment-5610</guid>
		<description>that varies depending whether you're signed in or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that varies depending whether you&#8217;re signed in or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael @ Freshome</title>
		<link>http://selfmademinds.com/200712/has-google-shrunk-its-index-or-cleaned-it-out/#comment-5607</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael @ Freshome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 12:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selfmademinds.com/200712/has-google-shrunk-its-index-or-cleaned-it-out/#comment-5607</guid>
		<description>I see that the numbers are back. Maybe they were tweaking something in the algoritm, and you noticed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see that the numbers are back. Maybe they were tweaking something in the algoritm, and you noticed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://selfmademinds.com/200712/has-google-shrunk-its-index-or-cleaned-it-out/#comment-5593</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selfmademinds.com/200712/has-google-shrunk-its-index-or-cleaned-it-out/#comment-5593</guid>
		<description>They have reverted back again now but were checked from various IP's this morning, strange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have reverted back again now but were checked from various IP&#8217;s this morning, strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abdul</title>
		<link>http://selfmademinds.com/200712/has-google-shrunk-its-index-or-cleaned-it-out/#comment-5590</link>
		<dc:creator>Abdul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 18:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selfmademinds.com/200712/has-google-shrunk-its-index-or-cleaned-it-out/#comment-5590</guid>
		<description>I am not surprised to be honest

google used to have so much indexed which wasn't that useful

however now it hopefully shrinks it to the most useful bits</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not surprised to be honest</p>
<p>google used to have so much indexed which wasn&#8217;t that useful</p>
<p>however now it hopefully shrinks it to the most useful bits</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://selfmademinds.com/200712/has-google-shrunk-its-index-or-cleaned-it-out/#comment-5585</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selfmademinds.com/200712/has-google-shrunk-its-index-or-cleaned-it-out/#comment-5585</guid>
		<description>Looks like a Google query for "tattoo" returns around 50 million results pages, and a query for "tattoos" returns over 23 mil - at 9:50 a.m. MST on Dec 3rd. Did you check all the datacenters when you noticed the strange fluctuation in pages indexed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a Google query for &#8220;tattoo&#8221; returns around 50 million results pages, and a query for &#8220;tattoos&#8221; returns over 23 mil - at 9:50 a.m. MST on Dec 3rd. Did you check all the datacenters when you noticed the strange fluctuation in pages indexed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Cook</title>
		<link>http://selfmademinds.com/200712/has-google-shrunk-its-index-or-cleaned-it-out/#comment-5572</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selfmademinds.com/200712/has-google-shrunk-its-index-or-cleaned-it-out/#comment-5572</guid>
		<description>Perhaps they're just dumping more into the supplemental index. (where it belongs...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps they&#8217;re just dumping more into the supplemental index. (where it belongs&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://selfmademinds.com/200712/has-google-shrunk-its-index-or-cleaned-it-out/#comment-5565</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 12:51:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://selfmademinds.com/200712/has-google-shrunk-its-index-or-cleaned-it-out/#comment-5565</guid>
		<description>I track the phrase "orlando villas". Down from 2 million to 225,000.

It was 4 million a few months ago, so this has happened before I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I track the phrase &#8220;orlando villas&#8221;. Down from 2 million to 225,000.</p>
<p>It was 4 million a few months ago, so this has happened before I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
